Saturday, August 16, 2014

Tax breaks granted by Ulster County for Nevele Casino project

A model to show what the future Nevele casino resort and spa in Ellenville will look like. Photo:Tania Barricklo – Daily Freeman


By William J. Kemble, news@freemanonline.com

KINGSTON >> The Nevele Casino, Resort and Spa on Wednesday was granted the payment-in-lieu-of-taxes (PILOT) agreement developers were looking for but lost support from an Ulster County legislator who said she felt deceived over the request for tax breaks.  Approval of a 15-year tax plan for the Wawarsing-based property was authorized during an Ulster County Industrial Development Agency meeting, with the Nevele to be given a five-year tax freeze at $173,104 followed by an incremented 10-year escalation to $11.56 million.  Officials said the payment plan will only be implemented if Nevele developers receive one of the seven state licences expected to be granted this year.

“If this licence isn’t granted, we have an authorization floating out there, but there’s no closing obviously because no one comes back to us to finalize the documents to close,” agency attorney Joseph Scott said.  Nevele officials have said if the tax freeze scheduled to begin when gaming operations start in October 2016 were turned down, there would have to be a $50 million reduction in the $464.67 million construction price to cover the financing.  Developers bought the former resort in April 2012 for $2,312,600 after a court battle with former owners. Plans for the project call for the site to be renovated and expanded to have a 446-room hotel; 70,000-square-foot casino; 22,000-square-foot ice rink; a conference center; and a golf course.  The applications also seeks exemptions for an estimated $15.35 million in state sales and use taxes and $3 million in mortgage taxes.
County Legislator Manna Jo Greene, D-Rosendale, following the vote said she was upset by the tax breaks because developers did not mention the application when seeking to sway her vote from abstaining to support on an endorsement resolution earlier this year.

“When this project came in front of the Legislature, one of the things that the developers touted were the tax benefits ... and now they’re asking for a PILOT,” she said.
“I had some concerns about a casino because I don’t believe that casinos are truly sustainable economic development,” Greene said. “But there are a lot of pros and cons and Ellenville certainly needs the economic boost and the jobs.”  Greene said developers, in a meeting before the endorsement vote, included an emphasis on solar energy, which is among her priorities when new projects are proposed in the region.  “I do not think we should be giving PILOTs to entities that are otherwise economically viable,” she said. “That was the picture that was painted. ... It leaves me with the sense that we are giving an unnecessary benefit to a developer.”  Developers during the session were met with some concerns about the absence of transparency involving financial backing of the casino, with agency board member Floyd Lattin questioning the wisdom of supporting a group that seeks overseas investors.

“ED5 is an entity based in Washington [D.C.] which pools investments from foreign nationals at a minimum of $500,000 per foreign national in order to get a theme park for residents in the United States,” he said. “Their web site talks about the fact that they look at projects that have an identified exit strategy of five to six years for their investors.”

Lattin, who voted in favor of the tax breaks, said his concern was based in recent closings announced among Atlantic City investors.  “I think that the obligation that ... we have as an agency is not only to foster employment growth but to foster sustainable employment growth,” he said.  “I think that [with] the capitalization of the Nevele, it’s very important to understand how secure and stable it is going forward because if we give you $100 million in tax incentives it’s a dramatic amount and we all hope that the project is successful,” Lattin said. “If we give you the tax incentives and you basically are unsuccessful and we face an Atlantic City sort of situation in two years it’s not a great use of our time.”

Nevele investment specialist Paul Hakim responded that investors would not have supported the application if there weren’t studies showing the long-term viability of a casino at the site.
“Multiple economic studies have been completed and due diligence has been completed by the investors,” he said.  Hakim said the Nevele is being developed differently from the plans used for Atlantic City casinos.  “When people go there, unfortunately, I think they just go gamble and they leave,” he said. “I think we’ve got much more to offer in the area. So we go back to the point of the [Nevele being] a destination resort.”

Crowdfunding: A Tectonic Shift in Real Estate Investing





Written by: David Drake  06.13.14
 Real estate investing is known to be a playground for the big boys. Only the  top 3% of the population in terms of financial wealth, can enjoy the game. With the democratization of financing via different means, most prominent would be the US Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, this industry is now opening up to include not just accredited investors but also non-accredited investors. Common folks that have a spare $1000 or even $100 can now play in the big league through crowdfunding.
The financial crisis involving real estate investments in the US was in fact a turning point for this sector and crowdfunding is playing a big role in its tectonic shift.

Changing the Game, the Rules or the Players?
Crowdfunding is the practice of raising funds from two or more people (referred to as the “crowd”) over the internet towards a common SPPICE (Service, Project, Product, Investment, Cause, Experience).
Crowdfunding allows everyone access to projects and funds through the web, while traditional financing allows a select few access to them via the stock exchange, banks and private equity funds.
Traditional real estate investing involves individual investors or firms putting their money in companies without knowledge of the projects they will fund. The new real estate crowdfunding provides a new investment model that allows investors to choose which projects they want to fund.

Crowdfunding versus Traditional Financing
  • Listing process and requirements for the crowdfunding system include project proposals and pitch, while the traditional financing system requires compliance to regulatory requirements and guidelines of stock exchange or banks.
  • The investment amount for crowdfunding can be as little as $100 while in the traditional financing system it is usually prescribed by stock or bond dealers, or determined through negotiations with banks or private fund managers.
  • The investors base for crowdfunding is the public while in  the traditional financing system it is restricted to registered stock or bond dealers, banks or private equity funds managers.
  • Interest in the crowdfunding system depends on offers and assessment of risks and returns by investors, while in the traditional financing system depends on rates prescribed by banks and return expectations of investors.
  • Fees involved in crowdfunding systems are based on rates starting at 1 percent, while the fees for the traditional financing system are prescribed by security dealers or banks.
For the Investor
  • Crowdfunding allows investors access to investment opportunities through websites, while in the traditional financing system the opportunities are accessed through the stock exchange, banks and private equity funds.
  • Investment procedures in the crowdfunding system include opening crowdfunding websites and selecting potential projects to invest into, while in the traditional financing system these are purchasing stocks or bonds from dealers, depositing funds to banks or private equity fund companies.
  • The investment amount in crowdfunding is at least $100, while in the traditional financing system it is prescribed by security dealers or negotiated with banks or private fund managers.
  • Crowdfunding system investment base includes startups, small businesses and medium enterprises, while in the traditional financing system it includes registered stock market dealers, banks/private equity fund managers.
  • Crowdfunding real estate investment returns are based on offering choices and depend on assessment of risks and returns by investors, while in the traditional financing system this depends on prescribed rates for banks, private equity fund companies and market performance.
  • Fees in the crowdfunding system depend on variable rates starting from 1 percent, while in the traditional financing system the rates are prescribed by security dealers, banks or private equity fund managers.
  • Placement period in the crowdfunding system is upon project completion, while in the traditional financing system there are market or instrument restrictions to content with.
How Investors Benefit
In crowdfunding, the investors get to choose the projects they want to invest, not only for the returns on their investment but for the reason behind the project.   They see the faces of these projects, instead of just the blank wall of the real estate company if you invest via the traditional mode. Oftentimes, the crowdfunding platforms also give  additional perks to the investor. The traditional system, on the other hand, will only provide the interests on bonds, increase on the real estate prices, or in declared dividends over time. Said benefit is significantly reduced due to high fees involved. 

Project-Driven Investment Decisions
The most important choice should be not which company to invest into, but rather which project to invest into. It is in the best interest of investors to consider project-driven investment decisions as opposed to increasingly unpopular company-driven investment decisions. In the new system, a company involved in real estate cannot succeed in marketing itself to potential investors, unless it rests on the merits of its current projects. The company would also need a track record of managing the risks or default rate.

Diversification and Risk Spreading
Investing into a single real estate company is like putting all the eggs in one basket. Investors can opt to put their money in available real estate investment projects through crowdfunding to mitigate any potential risks. Their funds are distributed  not only to several projects but also several companies, making this type of diversification implementation a very powerful tool for spreading risks. Failure of 1 project or 1 company can therefore be easily cancelled out by the success of other projects and companies.

Crowdfunding Platforms focused on Real Estate
Here are 20 players to watch in the emerging crowdfunding real estate investment industry, in no particular order:
These firms are included in the list of the Top 25 Real Estate Crowdfunding investment platforms on www.timesrealtynews.com.

Courting The Chinese Buyer

Updated June 21, 2012 10:37 p.m. ET

Late last year, Fang Yi Liu, a businessman from Shanghai, snapped up 17 apartments for a total of $14 million in the Artech, a modern glass building resembling a cruise ship that overlooks the Intracoastal Waterway near Miami. Courtesy of Fortune International


A new wave of buyers from China is snapping up luxury properties across the U.S., injecting billions of dollars into the country's residential-real-estate market. The industry is scrambling to court the new buyers. Some developers of new projects are installing wok kitchens, following feng shui principles and putting lucky numbers on choice units; others are packaging property sales with government programs designed to encourage foreign investment. Real-estate agencies are flying representatives to China, and hiring Mandarin-speaking agents. In Los Angeles, New York and even Miami, buyers mostly from China—and some are from Hong Kong, Singapore and Korea—are radically altering the landscape. Last month, a Chinese couple paid $34.5 million for a Versailles-style mansion on Sunset Boulevard in Beverly Hills, Calif. A year earlier, a Hong Kong businessman paid around $28 million for a nearby estate. Over the last six months in New York, several full-floor apartments in a new Manhattan high-rise called One57, each with a price tag of roughly $50 million, have gone into contract with Chinese buyers, according to two people close to the situation.

In a nod to Asian buyers, the building put many of its most luxurious full-floor apartments on the 80th through 88th floors—a clever way to appeal to the Chinese belief that eight is the luckiest number. Apartment 88 is under contract to a Chinese buyer for around $50 million.
Fifteen buyers from Asia have bought roughly $1 million apartments at New York's 515 E. 72nd St. in the last six months. In downtown Los Angeles, half of recent buyers for the new Ritz-Carlton Residences, which AEG developed, hail from Asia. Some buy in bulk: Late last year, Fang Yi Liu, a businessman from Shanghai, snapped up 17 apartments for a total of $14 million in the Artech, a modern glass building resembling a cruise ship that overlooks the Intracoastal Waterway near Miami.
Interest is surging even in parts of the country China-based buyers weren't traditionally interested in. Richard Zhou, a 41-year-old investment advisor who lives in Shanghai, paid $200,000 for a home in a large golf community in Fort Myers, Fla., last year. He said he bought in the community sight-unseen, trusting his friend who had bought a home there a few months earlier. Mr. Zhou spent two weeks studying the U.S. real-estate market and quickly decided Florida was a good bet because "it was highly impacted from the financial crisis," adding that later in his life he plans to retire there. "Florida is indeed a sunshine state, the weather is really pleasant, and the air quality is very good. Also, the food is safe, too."
Buyers from China and Hong Kong accounted for $9 billion of U.S. home sales in the 12 months ending in March, up 89% from 2010, making them the second-largest group of foreign buyers of homes in the U.S. behind Canadians, according to data released earlier this month by the National Association of Realtors. And many real-estate agents say the those figures are too low, as they track only sales on the multiple-listing service and don't reflect private sales. In addition, the data are based entirely on how real-estate agents classify buyers.
 Dolly Lenz, a luxury-real-estate broker in New York, estimates that half of her clients now hail from China, more than twice the amount two years ago. Pamela Liebman, chief executive of the Corcoran Group, says that the shopping for luxury properties by China-based buyers has accelerated dramatically since the start of 2012 to record-breaking levels. Foreign-investor interest in the American real-estate market began during the housing crisis, when plummeting property prices turned the U.S. into an attractive target for buyers around the world. The yuan has continued to rise—more than 7% against the dollar since June 2010—as has the number of China's wealthiest individuals. Meanwhile, in an effort to deflate China's housing bubble, the government has placed restrictions on multiple real-estate purchases and recently began to require more equity for mortgage loans.
"Because it's becoming more restrictive to invest at home and because Europe is so unstable, the U.S. property market is becoming incredibly attractive to the Chinese," says Patrick O'Neill, whose eponymous company in Hong Kong helps Asian investors buy real estate in the U.S. "America offers low interest rates, discounted prices and a safe harbor for their money." Di Meng, a native of Changchun who lives in Beijing, is currently attending the University of Southern California. The 23-year-old says the volatility of the Chinese government and, consequently, its economy, pushed him to invest in real estate overseas. Not keen to rent student housing, he recently paid around $800,000 for a Ritz-Carlton condo in downtown Los Angeles. "Compared to China, the United States is relatively stable," he says. "China has a purchase limit policy because the Chinese government tried to control and cool down the housing market in China, so if you've already bought a home in China, they do not support you to buy another."
In the last six months, 10 to 15 pricey units in One57, a glitzy new high-rise being built in midtown Manhattan, went into contract with wealthy Chinese buyers. When completed, the building—which features a Park Hyatt below the condo units—will be New York's tallest residential building. HNA Group, one of China's largest conglomerates that recently bought several commercial properties in New York, signed contracts for two full-floor apartments and two half-floor units in One57, according to a person close to the situation. On West 57th Street across from Carnegie Hall, overlooking Central Park, the building is slated to open in 2013. Real-estate agents typically divide buyers into four distinct groups: the super-wealthy buying properties upward of $15 million for personal use; those buying homes for a few million dollars, also for personal use; those purchasing investment properties, usually in the $1 million to $2 million range, to lease out; and those buying in bulk, as a commercial strategy. Steven Loh, a businessman from Singapore who runs a real-estate advisory group called Silkrouteasia Capital Partners, is a bulk buyer. He recently purchased six apartments in Los Angeles's Ritz-Carlton Residences for about $1 million each and is also facilitating a $60 million transaction with several overseas investors to buy more than 50 condos in another Los Angeles development. Mr. Loh says he wanted to get a jump on the market before property values rise. He isn't worried about Americans—he thinks it will be other Asian-based buyers and businesses who drive up prices, so he is courting them now to invest in the deals he's striking. "I believe there is a strong desire among Asian high-net-worth individuals to allocate, say, 10% to 25% of their wealth to U.S. assets," he says. "Asians have a high propensity and love for acquiring good quality real estate."

Some U.S. real-estate agents say that the current property craze reminds them of the real-estate shopping spree by the Japanese in the 1980s, a phenomenon that died with the collapse of Japan's economy. Unlike those days, buyers now tend to be a little more cautious, trying to avoid paying above market value and obsessively calculating rates of return. In addition, while borrowing drove many of the Japanese investments in prior decades, Chinese buyers tend to pay in cash.  Like many investors from Asian countries, buyers from China mostly want new construction. At Lambert Ranch, a gated development so new in Irvine, Calif., that the leaves on the palm trees haven't yet unfurled, buyers are lining up to buy homes asking between $900,000 to $1.5 million, says Mei Zhou, a Mandarin-speaking real-estate agent in Irvine who uses Skype to communicate with her clients in Asia. About 50% of Lambert's buyers so far are foreigners from Asia, say people close to the community. The development's first 42 available homes sold out in five weeks.
Real-estate agents say that while Chinese investors primarily target New York, Los Angeles and San Francisco, they are beginning to expand into cities in southern Florida as well as outposts such as Seattle and Las Vegas. That's a sea change from a few years ago, when they were "fearful" of Florida, says Steven Lawson, chief executive of Windham China, a Shanghai-based company that helps find Chinese buyers property in the U.S. "There was a false perception in China that Miami is not a supersafe city because a lot of Chinese watch 'CSI: Miami' or 'Miami Vice' on TV."
Over the past year, Mr. Lawson says he sold about eight homes in a large golf community in Fort Myers to Chinese buyers. The houses, which span about 2,500 square feet and come fully decorated, cost less than $250,000—a bargain to Beijing and Shanghai residents used to adding another zero to buy a home of that size. Real-estate agencies and banks are mobilizing to capitalize on the boom. Mr. O'Neill says demand for his company's semiannual investment seminar, which teaches pre-qualified buyers in China about how real-estate buying works in the U.S. and is held in ballrooms and private clubs, has doubled over the last six months. Banks in China are ramping up their services in the arena, too, flying in U.S. real-estate agents to sit on panels about how to buy property in the U.S. and showcase trophy properties in New York and Los Angeles in PowerPoint presentations.

Evan Joseph

 In the last six months this building in New York, 515 E. 72nd St. has attracted 15 buyers from Asia.  Some developers and real-estate agents are trying to capitalize on government programs that encourage foreigners to invest in the U.S. For example, the EB-5 program makes foreign investors eligible for permanent U.S. residency in exchange for investing at least $500,000 in ventures that create at least 10 jobs in the U.S. Jerry Kaufman, a developer at J. Milton & Associates in Miami, pitches a package to the Chinese where they can invest in an EB-5 approved investment vehicle called the Atlantic American Opportunities Fund in Florida—and then spend more to buy a condo in J. Milton's nearby development, the St. Tropez, in Sunny Isles Beach near Miami. So far, he says, he has signed up 20 Chinese families to invest in the fund and buy units in the condo building, which sell for an average of $700,000. Mr. Kaufman is currently in negotiations to buy a 100-acre plot of land north of Miami in an effort to create Miami's first Chinatown, a free-trade zone with casinos, restaurants, art galleries, shopping and hotels. "We'd call it New China," he says. Others are taking quicker routes: In the past few months, Corcoran's Ms. Liebman has started regularly sending four of her agents to China, forged partnerships with three real-estate companies there and hired several Mandarin-speaking agents in the U.S.
With options like wok kitchens—a separate space with strong ventilation needed for aromatic cooking—or a guest unit for a grandparent, California's Lambert Ranch was designed from the start with the Asia-based buyer in mind. Robert Hidey, Lambert Ranch's architect, who has designed extensively in China, built the community's main roads on a north-south axis and ensured the homes had south-facing windows—both pillars of good feng shui. In addition to creating multigenerational housing options and wok kitchens, the New Home Co., which developed Lambert Ranch, also buried gold coins on the property in accordance with feng shui principles. To avoid having any addresses starting with the number four, unlucky in China, the development starts its addresses at 50. In Los Angeles, brokers for the Ritz-Carlton Residences have been inviting buyers in China to stay for two nights free at the hotel as part of the Ritz's broader strategy to appeal to Asian buyers, called the "Pacific Rim Plan." The visit concludes with a Champagne toast in one of the Ritz residences, although guests must pay their own airfare. "All we do now is visit China, Hong Kong and Singapore," says Jim Jacobson, who runs international sales for the Ritz-Carlton Residences. "We've realized that's where our market lies." The Ritz-Carlton Residences range from one-bedroom condos costing around $850,000 to larger ones priced at $2.5 million to penthouses, which top out at $9.3 million.
Others are simply turning to Chinese media to market themselves—and their wares.

 Jing Chen, a broker for Corcoran in New York, writes a column in Mandarin for a popular Chinese website, Sinovision.net. Last year, she wrote a column about Harlem brownstones gaining in value; eight months later, she sold three of them to Chinese buyers, each for somewhere between $1 million and $2 million apiece. "The Chinese are like Hollywood celebrities," she says. "Once one Chinese person buys a brownstone, they all want one."